Challenges and progress of chemical modification in piezoelectric composites and their applications
Abstract
Piezoelectric materials directly convert energy between electrical and mechanical domains, and have been widely employed in electronic devices as sensors and energy harvesters. Recent research endeavors are mainly devoted to dealing with problems such as high stiffness, brittleness, toxicity, poor durability, and low piezoelectric coefficients. Among developed strategies, chemical modification captures much attention. However, the exact physical properties and direct experimental evidence of chemical modification remain elusive or controversial thus far. In this review, we discuss the recently developed piezoelectric modification strategies for piezoelectric composites and assess the effect of different chemical modification approaches on piezoelectric properties. Moreover, we outline existing challenges and new applications of piezoelectric composites.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
In 1880, French physicists J. Curie and P. Curie found that the surface of quartz crystal generates electric charge under pressure, and the amount of charge is directly proportional to the pressure amplitude, which effect is named the piezoelectric effect[1]. As shown in Figure 1A, the piezoelectric effect is defined as a
Figure 1. The mechanism, classification, and piezoelectric coefficient of typical piezoelectric materials. (A) Converse and direct piezoelectric effects; (B) typical piezoelectric single crystals, ceramics, and polymers; (C) d33 of some typical piezoelectric materials. BSPT: BiScO3-PbTiO3; BNKLBT: (Na,Bi)TiO3-(K,Bi)TiO3-(Li,Bi)TiO3-BaTiO3; PZNT: PbZn1/3Nb2/3O3-PbTiO3; PMNT:
Figure 2. The temperature-stress-electric field coupling interaction of piezoelectric materials.
Though Piezoelectric ceramics show excellent d33, they are rigid and brittle; piezoelectric polymers exhibit sufficient flexibility but usually have a low d33. Composite materials combining piezoelectric ceramics into soft polymer matrix have unique advantages, because the composite materials have the flexibility of organic polymer and excellent piezoelectric properties of piezoelectric ceramics. However, (1) how to improve the surface properties of inorganic nano materials; (2) how to improve their dispersion in the polymer matrix; and (3) how to enhance the bonding between ceramics and polymers are three huge challenges. In this regard, researchers proposed high-performance piezoelectric devices by using nanowire growth, transfer techniques, electrospinning, compositing and chemical modification methods[6-8]. Among these approaches, chemical modification has the advantages of simplicity and low cost.
Chemical modification effectively controls the piezoelectric output by tuning the surface charge density of ceramic and polymer materials. For ceramic materials, chemically modified phase structures associated with ionic substitution play an important role in improving piezoelectric properties. Three common lead-free piezoelectric components, namely barium titanate (BaTiO3, BT), potassium-sodium niobate
Figure 3. Chemically modified piezoelectric materials. (A) Cationic-substitution-modified ceramics; (B) the direct terpolymerization scheme of VDF, TrFE and CTFE[41]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society; (C) reaction scheme of P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) treated with triethylamine[46]. Copyright 2022, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Since the classification of two-phase piezoelectric ceramic/polymer composites was first proposed by R. E. Newnham in 1978, more and more attention has been paid to piezoelectric composites on account of their excellent comprehensive properties[3,47,48]. How to improve the dispersion in polymer matrix and enhance the bonding between ceramic and polymer has become an important research direction in ceramic-polymer composites. A uniform dispersion of piezoelectric particles in the composite film is crucial for fabricating piezoelectric materials with high output, as it ensures a uniformly distributed piezoelectric potential within the active energy-harvesting composite layer. Chemical modification creates the opportunity to incorporate polar molecules into non-polar molecular structures without problems of dispersion and compatibility, thus increasing their piezoelectric properties. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in
CHEMICAL MODIFICATION IN PIEZOELECTRIC COMPOSITES
Chemically modified composites incorporating piezoceramic particles into polymers have unique advantages such as simple and scalable fabrication, low cost, high mechanical durability, and flexibility. Three non-hazardous chemical treatments, silylation, amidation and grafting, are usually available to modify composites. This section analyzes the research progress into chemically-reinforced piezoelectric composites since 2000. Figure 4 shows the outline of this section.
Figure 4. Outline of the technical content of chemical modified piezoelectric composites.
Silylation
Silylation reaction usually uses the SiOH group hydrolyzed by trimethoxysilyl or triethylsilane-based elastomers to modify the surface of nano materials, primarily, 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APS),
Figure 5. Piezoelectric materials chemically modified by silane coupling agents. (A) The schematic diagram of silane coupling agent modified ZnO and PVDF-TrFE[60]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier; (B) β nucleating effect of the KNN nanorods in the PVDF matrix[55]. Copyright 2019, Springer US. (C) schematic illustration of surface functionalization method and strong bonds between the nanoparticles and the polymer matrix after the ultraviolet curing process[58]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
APS modifier plays an influential role in maximizing the use of the excellent electroactive phases of PVDF polymer to enhance its piezoelectric response. Bairagi et al. found that the growth of PVDF polymer electroactive phases was significantly improved by adding APS-modified KNN nanorods[55]. In particular, the β crystal portion of surface-modified KNN nanorod-based films was improved (17% for pure PVDF, 45% for untreated KNN-based films, and more than 50% for surface-modified KNN based films). Figure 5B describes the nucleation mechanism of KNN nanorods in the PVDF polymer matrix[55]. Following that, they added APS-modified KNN nanorods to PVDF electrospinning nets to further enhance the piezoelectric property[56]. The maximum output voltage and current of composite piezoelectric materials are 21 V and
A similar response has been reported with other silane-based coupling agents to modified BTO and PZT nanocomposites. During this process, the silane coupling agent is coated onto nanoparticles to improve the interface interactions and compatibility between the nanoparticles and polymer matrix. Recently, Wang
Piezoelectric composites modified by silane coupling agents show both superior β-phase content and charge collecting area. The selection of an appropriate silane modifier is conducive to improving the electroactive phase of PVDF-based polymers and plays a key role in maximizing their piezoelectric properties.
Amidation
Amidation reaction is described as follows: If ammonia or amine is used to react with carboxylic acid, it is necessary to control the equilibrium conditions to prevent excessive product; If amine and acyl chloride are used for preparation, low temperature and alkali shall be added, and the addition rate of raw materials shall be controlled to control heat release; If amine reacts with anhydride, catalysts such as sulfuric acid and peroxy acid should be added. The mechanism of the amidation reaction is shown in Figure 6A.
Figure 6. Enhancement in the electroactive crystalline phase and dielectric performance of amidated PVDF composites. (A) The mechanism of the amidation reaction; (B) schematic illustration for the dispersion of ionic liquid functionalized MWNTs within the PVDF matrix[62]. Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society; (C) chemical structures of peptides used[65]. Copyright 2021,
Thanks to the strong charge interaction, The covalent bond formed by amidation improves composites’ mechanical and electrical properties[61]. In view of this, Mandal et al. prepared an ionic liquid (I.L.) integrated multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWNT-IL) by amidation reaction between MWNT-COOH and IL-NH2, as shown in Figure 6B[62]. Their report explained that covalently anchored I.L. could uniformly disperse MWCNT in PVDF matrix, preferentially β nucleus due to dipole interaction. Using the same approach, Chen et al. synthesized a novel PEG-graphene through an amidation reaction between graphene oxide and methoxypolyethylene glycol amin[63]. The formation of hydrogen bond leads to PVDF macromolecular chain contacting with graphene, forming a β phase with perfect TTTT chain sequence. The dielectric constant of 10 wt.% PEG-graphene (53.3) is 6.5 times that of pure PVDF. It is believed that the amidation of nanoparticles and the formation of hydrogen bonds with polymers promote PVDF-based composites with excellent piezoelectric properties.
Furthermore, a few research attempts are applied to improve piezoelectric composites’ performance by amidation after modification of nanoparticles and polymers. For example, Pongampai et al. propose a triboelectric-piezoelectric hybrid nanogenerator based on BaTiO3-Nanorods/Chitosa[64]. The direct coupling between the BT-NPs and the chitosan matrix makes it trapped in the polymer network, which significantly increases the dispersion of BT-NPs in the chitosan matrix. The harvested open-circuit voltage and current density can get to 111.4 V and 21.6 μ, respectively, sufficient to drive 100 LEDs. Amine functionalization also affects the stability and rigidity of monolayers. Petroff et al. manufactured a piezoelectric force and touch sensor with oligopeptides to attain large piezoelectric responses without electro polarization through self-assembly technology [Figure 6C][65]. A maximum value of (9.8 ± 1.5) pC N-1 is obtained from the assembly composed of amide-terminated CA6 functionalized printed circuit boards (PCBs) [Figure 6D]. The amidation reduces the α-helix, allowing for a dipole change in the deformation under compression, ultimately producing a greater piezoelectric response.
Grafting
The grafting method uses the chemical reaction between a reactive group on the material surface and the grafted monomer or macromolecular chain. Piezoelectric nanoparticles can be integrated into the composite film through grafting reactions that improve the distribution uniformity of nanoparticles in the polymer matrix. Figure 7A shows the mechanism of the grafting reaction.
Figure 7. Composite piezoelectric films prepared by grafting nanoparticles with polymers. (A) The mechanism of the grafting reaction; (B) schematic of the fabrication of PVDFNF-IGO composite nanofibers[67]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd; (C) the synthesis procedure of the PMMA@BaTiO3 nanowires by ATRP technology[71]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier BV; (D) schematic illustration of the fabrication of layered CPNF membranes[72]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd.
Grafting is a simple and economical method to coordinate the interaction of polymers with nanomaterials[64,66]. For instance, Ramasamy et al. prepared a PVDF nanofibers sensor by using
A different work focuses on grafting polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) onto BaTiO3 nanowires through atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) technology [Figure 7C][71]. The polymer grown from the inorganic filler surface in situ ATRP produces a strong interface with the fillers, and endows nanocomposites with increased dielectric constant and ultra-low dielectric loss[71]. As expected, PMMA grafting of BaTiO3 nanowires resulted in a more uniform dispersion in the PVDF-TrFE matrix and an improved stress transfer at the interface between them. They report a maximum export voltage of 12.6 V and output power of 4.25 μW in composites at 10 wt% filler concentration; it is 2.2 times and 7.6 times upper than that of the composites with unmodified BaTiO3 and without BaTiO3 nanowires.
Interestingly, grafting reaction can take place on polymers surface. Wang et al. developed a layered piezoelectric nanogenerator using maleic anhydride grafted PVDF covalently bonded to cotton cellulose nanofibers (CNF) [Figure 7D][72]. These membranes show a clear double-layer structure, and the PBT@CNF layer in all membranes is tightly attached to the PNF layer, and there is no observation of layers and gaps. Under strong interface interaction, the maximum tensile strength of double-layer CPNF film is 47.99 ± 4.08 MPa at 5.0 wt% pBT. The layered PENGs produce significantly reinforced piezoelectricity, increasing d33 from 1.63 to 27.2 pC/N as the loading of pBT from 0% to 5.0 wt%[73,74]. A maximum in the output performance (Voc = 3.2 V, Isc = 0.25 μA) is achieved at a 5.0 wt% pBT loading. The significant improvement in piezoelectric output is attributed to the synergistic effect of these piezoelectric elements in the layered structure and the local stress concentration caused by the rigid pBT nanoparticles.
Table 1 shows the preparation and some parameters of new piezoelectric composites[56,71,75-83]. Compared with similar polymer matrix composites injected with carbon nanotube fillers or unmodified nanoparticles, the piezoelectric coefficient of chemically modified composites is significantly improved. In summary, chemical modification is a straightforward technique for enhancing the performance of piezoelectric composites.
A survey of the main parameters of piezoelectric composites
APPLICATION
Piezoelectric composites offer mechanical flexibility, suitable voltages with sufficient power output, lower manufacturing costs, and ease of rapid processing compared to ceramic and polymer materials. They thus have a great potential to benefit a diverse set of applications. This section explores the application of chemically modified piezoelectric composites in sensors, energy harvesters, and acoustic transducers.
Sensors
Sensors based on piezoelectric composites can respond to changes in physical quantities, such as pressure, sound waves, and airflow. Its sensitive element is made of piezoelectric materials, and when the piezoelectric material is subjected to an external force, charges will be formed on its surface. After the charge passes through a charge amplifier, the amplification of the measurement circuit, and the impedance transformation, it will be converted into an electrical output proportional to the external force received.
Pressure sensors are used in sporting gloves for simultaneous impact absorption and punching force mapping. Hong et al. developed a 3D-printed flexible piezoelectric nanocomposite with a tensile dominant micro-mechanical structure with a design thickness (5 mm)[84]. Then, boxing gloves were inserted to provide spatial and temporal resolution mapping of the reaction force applied to the hand joints during boxing activities[84]. They first functionalized the nanoparticles and covalently grafted them onto the surface of the piezoelectric nanoparticles. Then, they combined the modified piezoelectric particles with the photopolymer after curing by covalent chemical bonds (CH2-CH2 groups) under UV light [Figure 8A]. The 3D-printable piezoelectric nanocomposites designed by chemical modification exceed the existing compliance and functional performance trade-offs, highlighting their potential as flexible sensors and wearable devices. Compared to the commercial PVDF (d33 ≈ 27 pC N-1), functionalized piezoelectric composite has a higher piezoelectric charge constant d33 (≈ 110 pC N-1). Ramasamy et al. grafted phenyl isocyanate on the surface of graphene oxide, and blended it with PVDF by electrospinning to prepare a composite piezoelectric material [Figure 8B][67]. The functionalization of phenyl isocyanate on the surface of graphene oxide can enhance its dispersion in organic solvents, conducive to its effective hybridization with PVDF. At 10 MΩ load resistance, the PVDFNF-IGO composite displayed the optimal piezoelectric property with an output voltage of 22.8 V and a power of 51.984 µW, 24.6% higher and 55.23% upper than those of the original PVDFNFs, respectively. Furthermore, the sensor sensitivity of the composites is 63.09% higher than that of the pristine PVDF.
Figure 8. Piezoelectric composites in sensors. (A) Chemical structure of the UV-sensitive monomer matrix and the functionalized PZT particles[84]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH Verlag; (B) the experimental setup used to measure the output voltages/sensitivities of the piezoelectric sensors[67]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd; (C) the kirigami-structured HAPNC sensor to monitor MSDs[85]. Copyright 2021, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
In addition, sensors are also well used in artificial intelligence. In our lab, a 3D-interconnected piezoelectric composite was manufactured to monitor the motions of a soft robot[85]. The piezoelectric composite is the core sensory element. A lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramic network is constructed in Kirigami honeycomb grids and then filled with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [Figure 8C]. Through silane modification, the designed kirigami structure has a high piezoelectric sensitivity (15.4 mV kPa-1) and high linearity (R2 = 0.98) compared to the composite with randomly dispersed fillers. Piezoelectric sensors show many advantages, including extensive measurement range, high voltage electrical anisotropy, and long-term monitoring capability.
Energy harvesters
The basic working principle of the piezoelectric energy harvester is the piezoelectric effect, that is, the deformation of the piezoelectric material under the excitation of the external vibration causes the asymmetry of the dipole inside the material and the polarization phenomenon. At the same time, electrical charges are accumulated on surface electrodes. Detailed information on energy harvesters can be found in the review papers[86,87]. Our group analyzed the dynamic responses of energy harvesters excited by vibrations from multiple directions using a nonlinear compressive-mode PZT plate[88], which enhanced the practicability of energy collection in complex environments. Moreover, we developed a transmuscular ultrasonic wireless energy transfer system based on a flexible wood-templated piezoelectric energy harvester [Figure 9A]. It can output open circuit voltage (~4.5 V) and short circuit current (~120 μA), all meeting biomedical equipment’s needs[89].
Figure 9. Piezoelectric composites in energy harvesters. (A) Schematic illustration showing the structure of the W-PUEH device based on natural wood with lattice-like cellulose channels[89]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry; (B) the PZT NPs are
Recently, several research attempts have been carried out to improve the performance of energy harvesters by amidation after modification of nanoparticles and polymers, respectively. For instance, Yao et al. developed a PZT flexible piezoelectric energy harvester by amidation of PZT and triblock copolymer[83]. This chemically reinforced composite contains stably dispersed PZT nanoparticles in the polymer matrix. It performs excellently under bending strain, with a high output voltage of 65 V and a current of 1.6 μA [Figure 9B]. It can also collect the energy generated during the movement of upper arm muscles, as shown in Figure 9C. The above work shows that the output voltage of piezoelectric energy harvesters usually reaches tens of volts, enough to drive most electronic devices in daily life.
Acoustic transducers
Piezoelectric transducers operate in the acoustic spectrum range, including audio, ultrasonic, and infrasonic frequency ranges[90]. They use the piezoelectric effect and resonance to convert electrical energy into mechanical vibration. Many composite-based ultrasonic transducers have been reported[91-95], and we here choose two studies to illustrate the performance differences between different composites.
Electrical stimulation produced by piezoelectric materials can enhance nerve regeneration to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Jiang et al. proposed a piezoelectric patch (LF-PUEH) based on flexible
Figure 10. Illustration of piezoelectric composites in the acoustic transducers. (A) Schematic and design of the flexible LF-PUEH device[95]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH Verlag; (B) output voltage and power density of the device as a function of input voltage[95]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH Verlag; (C) schematic of a flexible electret loudspeaker, and an exploded view of a flexible electret loudspeaker[96]. Copyright 2010, IOP Publishing Ltd.
For piezoelectric transducer applications, some devices cannot be replaced by lead-free piezoelectric composites in a short period of time due to some thorny issues such as low strain response and poor temperature stability. Researchers should pay more attention to these thorny issues by chemically modifying lead-free piezoelectric composites to fabricate simple, robust and large-scale piezoelectric transducers for commercial mass production in the future.
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
This review sorts out the design and preparation progress of chemically-reinforced high-performance piezoelectric composites in recent years, and preliminary evaluates the feasibility of the implementation of this scheme. The chemical methods promote the design of piezoelectric composites and help the application of piezoelectric functional systems in energy, medicine, and environmental engineering. In the future research process, further development of piezoelectric composites needs to consider the following aspects.
1. Modifier selection: Metal-organic frameworks are a new type of porous crystal hybrid materials, which allows the insertion of charges and molecules, and can effectively induce strong interfacial coupling effects in polymers. It is expected to be an excellent modifier for piezoelectric composites.
2. Chemical modification selection: The piezoelectric properties of the material are largely affected by the preparation process and the proportion of raw materials. Different chemical modification methods or a combination of multiple modification methods should be selected according to the material properties.
3. Combined with theoretical simulation: Computational simulation would facilitate our understanding of the surface chemical states of materials, and provide new ideas and theoretical guidance for the chemical modification technology of piezoelectric materials.
Overall, since the research on chemically modified piezoelectric composites is still at an early stage, great attention should be paid to modifier selection, compatibility, flexibility, and long-term stability. It is believed that in the near future, chemically modified lead-free piezoelectric composites will play a greater role in the overall piezoelectric materials and their applications.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributionsInvestigation and writing-original draft: Zhang W
Writing-review and editing: Zhang Y, Yan X, Hong Y, Yang Z
Supervision: Yang Z
Availability of data and materialsNot applicable.
Financial support and sponsorshipThe work described in this paper was supported by General Research Grant (Project No. 11212021, No. 11210822) from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and Innovation and Technology Fund and the Research Talent Hub of the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (ITS/065/20).
Conflicts of interestAll authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participateNot applicable.
Consent for publicationNot applicable.
Copyright© The Author(s) 2023.
REFERENCES
1. Zhang Y, Li J. Review of chemical modification on potassium sodium niobate lead-free piezoelectrics. J Mater Chem C 2019;7:4284-303.
2. Mokhtari F, Latifi M, Shamshirsaz M. Electrospinning/electrospray of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF): piezoelectric nanofibers. J Text Inst 2016;107:1037.
3. Damjanovic D. Ferroelectric, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of ferroelectric thin films and ceramics. Rep Prog Phys 1998;61:1267-324.
4. Newnham R, Skinner D, Cross L. Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites. Mat Res Bull 1978;13:525-36.
5. Chandra P, Littlewood PB. A landau primer for ferroelectrics. Physics of ferroelectrics. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. pp. 69-116.
6. Deng W, Zhou Y, Libanori A, Chen G, Yang W, Chen J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for personalized healthcare. Chem Soc Rev 2022;51:3380-435.
7. Tian G, Deng W, Yang T, et al. Insight into interfacial polarization for enhancing piezoelectricity in ferroelectric nanocomposites. Small 2023;19:e2207947.
8. Yousry YM, Yao K, Mohamed AM, Liew WH, Chen S, Ramakrishna S. Theoretical model and outstanding performance from constructive piezoelectric and triboelectric mechanism in electrospun PVDF fiber film. Adv Funct Mater 2020;30:1910592.
9. Wu J, Xiao D, Zhu J. Potassium-sodium niobate lead-free piezoelectric materials: past, present, and future of phase boundaries. Chem Rev 2015;115:2559-95.
10. Du H, Zhou W, Luo F, Zhu D, Qu S, Pei Z. An approach to further improve piezoelectric properties of (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3-based lead-free ceramics. Appl Phys Lett 2007;91:202907.
11. Aksel E, Jones JL. Advances in lead-free piezoelectric materials for sensors and actuators. Sensors 2010;10:1935-54.
12. Lv X, Wu J, Zhu J, Xiao D, Zhang X. A new method to improve the electrical properties of KNN-based ceramics: Tailoring phase fraction. J Eur Ceram Soc 2018;38:85-94.
13. Kong Z, Bai W, Zheng P, et al. Enhanced electromechanical properties of CaZrO3-modified (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3-based lead-free ceramics. Ceram Int 2017;43:7237-42.
14. Lei C, Ye Z. Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics derived from the K0.5Na0.5NbO3-AgNbO3 solid solution system. Appl Phys Lett 2008;93:042901.
15. Huan Y, Zhang X, Song J, et al. High-performance piezoelectric composite nanogenerator based on Ag/(K,Na)NbO3 heterostructure. Nano Energy 2018;50:62-9.
16. Lee S, Baek S, Kim H, et al. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of 0.95(Na0.5K0.5)NbO3-0.05CaTiO3 ceramics with Ag2O contents. Electron Mater Lett 2012;8:577-80.
17. Wu J, Xiao D, Wang Y, Zhu J, Yu P. Effects of K content on the dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties of 0.95(KxNa1-x)NbO3−0.05LiSbO3 lead-free ceramics. J Appl Phys 2008;103:024102.
18. Zhao Y, Huang R, Liu R, Wang X, Zhou H. Enhanced dielectric and piezoelectric properties in Li/Sb-modified (Na,K)NbO3 ceramics by optimizing sintering temperature. Ceram Int 2013;39:425-9.
19. Zuo R, Fu J, Lv D, Liu Y. Antimony tuned rhombohedral-orthorhombic phase transition and enhanced piezoelectric properties in sodium potassium niobate: antimony tuned rhombohedral-orthorhombic phase transition. J Am Ceram Soc 2010;93:2783-7.
20. Chang Y, Yang Z, Ma D, Liu Z, Wang Z. Phase transitional behavior, microstructure, and electrical properties in Ta-modified [(K0.458Na0.542)0.96Li0.04] NbO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. J Appl Phys 2008;104:024109.
21. Fu J, Zuo R, Xu Z. High piezoelectric activity in (Na,K)NbO3 based lead-free piezoelectric ceramics: contribution of nanodomains. Appl Phys Lett 2011;99:062901.
22. Wu J, Wang X, Cheng X, et al. New potassium-sodium niobate lead-free piezoceramic: giant-
23. Zheng T, Wu J, Xiao D, Zhu J. Giant
24. Zhang B, Wu J, Cheng X, et al. Lead-free piezoelectrics based on potassium-sodium niobate with giant
25. Jiang L, Li Y, Xing J, et al. Phase structure and enhanced piezoelectric properties in (1-x)(K0.48Na0.52)(Nb0.95Sb0.05)O3-x(Bi0.5Na0.42Li0.08)0.9Sr0.1ZrO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Ceram Int 2017;43:2100-6.
26. Zheng T, Wu J, Xiao D, Zhu J, Wang X, Lou X. Composition-driven phase boundary and piezoelectricity in potassium-sodium niobate-based ceramics. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2015;7:20332-41.
27. Pi Z, Zhang J, Wen C, Zhang Z, Wu D. Flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator made of poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE) thin film. Nano Energy 2014;7:33-41.
28. Wan C, Bowen CR. Multiscale-structuring of polyvinylidene fluoride for energy harvesting: the impact of molecular-, micro- and macro-structure. J Mater Chem A 2017;5:3091-128.
29. Liu Y, Wang Q. Ferroelectric polymers exhibiting negative longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient: progress and prospects. Adv Sci 2020;7:1902468.
30. Soulestin T, Ladmiral V, Dos Santos FD, Améduri B. Vinylidene fluoride- and trifluoroethylene-containing fluorinated electroactive copolymers. How does chemistry impact properties? Prog Polym Sci 2017;72:16-60.
31. Wegener M, Wirges W, Gerhard-multhaupt R. Piezoelectric polyethylene terephthalate (PETP) foams - specifically designed and prepared ferroelectret films. Adv Eng Mater 2005;7:1128-31.
32. Zhang Z, Litt MH, Zhu L. Unified understanding of ferroelectricity in
33. Novikov GK, Smirnov AI. Electret effect in polyolefins joined by x-ray radiation of an electric gas barrier discharge. Russ Phys J 2011;53:1113-7.
34. Ribeiro C, Costa CM, Correia DM, et al. Electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based structures for advanced applications. Nat Protoc 2018;13:681-704.
35. Li Z, Wang Y, Cheng Z. Electromechanical properties of poly(vinylidene-fluoride-chlorotrifluoroethylene) copolymer. Appl Phys Lett 2006;88:062904.
36. Koyama D, Nakamura K. Electric power generation using vibration of a polyurea piezoelectric thin film. Appl Acoust 2010;71:439-45.
37. David G, Boyer C, Tonnar J, Ameduri B, Lacroix-Desmazes P, Boutevin B. Use of iodocompounds in radical polymerization. Chem Rev 2006;106:3936-62.
38. Liu Y, Aziguli H, Zhang B, et al. Ferroelectric polymers exhibiting behaviour reminiscent of a morphotropic phase boundary. Nature 2018;562:96-100.
39. Yu YJ, McGaughey AJ. Energy barriers for dipole moment flipping in PVDF-related ferroelectric polymers. J Chem Phys 2016;144:014901.
40. Lu Y, Claude J, Zhang Q, Wang Q. Microstructures and dielectric properties of the ferroelectric fluoropolymers synthesized via reductive dechlorination of poly(vinylidene fluoride-
41. Han Z, Liu Y, Chen X, Xu W, Wang Q. Enhanced piezoelectricity in poly(vinylidene fluoride-
42. Liu F, Hashim NA, Liu Y, Abed MM, Li K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. J Membr Sci 2011;375:1-27.
43. Lin J, Malakooti MH, Sodano HA. Thermally stable poly(vinylidene fluoride) for high-performance printable piezoelectric devices. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2020;12:21871-82.
44. Wang Y, Wang H, Liu K, Wang T, Yuan C, Yang H. Effect of dehydrofluorination reaction on structure and properties of PVDF electrospun fibers. RSC Adv 2021;11:30734-43.
45. Liang T, Zha J, Wang D, Hu P, Dang Z. Dielectric properties of chemical dehydrofluorinated poly(vinylidene fluoride). J Adv Phys 2015;4:380-3.
46. Chen X, Qin H, Qian X, et al. Relaxor ferroelectric polymer exhibits ultrahigh electromechanical coupling at low electric field. Science 2022;375:1418-22.
48. Yang Y, Chen Z, Song X, et al. Biomimetic anisotropic reinforcement architectures by electrically assisted nanocomposite 3D printing. Adv Mater 2017;29:1605750.
49. Jo W, Dittmer R, Acosta M, et al. Giant electric-field-induced strains in lead-free ceramics for actuator applications-status and perspective. J Electroceram 2012;29:71-93.
50. Tian G, Deng W, Xiong D, et al. Dielectric micro-capacitance for enhancing piezoelectricity via aligning MXene sheets in composites. Cell Rep Phys Sci 2022;3:100814.
51. Kaczmarek H, Królikowski B, Klimiec E, Chylińska M, Bajer D. Advances in the study of piezoelectric polymers. Russ Chem Rev 2019;88:749-74.
52. Xie L, Wang G, Jiang C, Yu F, Zhao X. Properties and applications of flexible poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based piezoelectric materials. Crystals 2021;11:644.
53. Cao X, Xiong Y, Sun J, Zhu X, Sun Q, Wang ZL. Piezoelectric nanogenerators derived self-powered sensors for multifunctional applications and artificial intelligence. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2102983.
54. Wang Z, Cheng J, Hu R, et al. An approach combining additive manufacturing and dielectrophoresis for 3D-structured flexible lead-free piezoelectric composites for electromechanical energy conversion. J Mater Chem A 2021;9:26767-76.
55. Bairagi S, Ali SW. Effects of surface modification on electrical properties of KNN nanorod-incorporated PVDF composites. J Mater Sci 2019;54:11462-84.
56. Bairagi S, Ali SW. Flexible lead-free PVDF/SM-KNN electrospun nanocomposite based piezoelectric materials: significant enhancement of energy harvesting efficiency of the nanogenerator. Energy 2020;198:117385.
57. Su YP, Sim LN, Coster HG, Chong TH. Incorporation of barium titanate nanoparticles in piezoelectric PVDF membrane. J Membr Sci 2021;640:119861.
58. Cui H, Hensleigh R, Yao D, et al. Three-dimensional printing of piezoelectric materials with designed anisotropy and directional response. Nat Mater 2019;18:234-41.
59. Wu J, Ma W, Chi M, Wang S, Zhang P. Effect of surface modification of ferroelectric ceramic component on the properties of PZT-type/epoxy piezoelectric composite with spiral structure. J Alloy Compd 2020;820:153362.
60. Li J, Zhao C, Xia K, Liu X, Li D, Han J. Enhanced piezoelectric output of the PVDF-TrFE/ZnO flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator by surface modification. Appl Surf Sci 2019;463:626-34.
61. Xing C, Zhao L, You J, Dong W, Cao X, Li Y. Impact of ionic liquid-modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the crystallization behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride). J Phys Chem B 2012;116:8312-20.
62. Mandal A, Nandi AK. Ionic liquid integrated multiwalled carbon nanotube in a poly(vinylidene fluoride) matrix: formation of a piezoelectric β-polymorph with significant reinforcement and conductivity improvement. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2013;5:747-60.
63. Chen J, Li Y, Zheng X, He F, Lam K. Enhancement in electroactive crystalline phase and dielectric performance of novel PEG-graphene/PVDF composites. Appl Surf Sci 2018;448:320-30.
64. Pongampai S, Charoonsuk T, Pinpru N, et al. Triboelectric-piezoelectric hybrid nanogenerator based on BaTiO3-nanorods/chitosan enhanced output performance with self-charge-pumping system. Compos Part B Eng 2021;208:108602.
65. Petroff CA, Cassone G, Šponer J, Hutchison GR. Intrinsically polar piezoelectric self-assembled oligopeptide monolayers. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2007486.
66. Huang X, Jiang P. Core-shell structured high-k polymer nanocomposites for energy storage and dielectric applications. Adv Mater 2015;27:546-54.
67. Ramasamy M, Rahaman A, Kim B. Effect of phenyl-isocyanate functionalized graphene oxide on the crystalline phases, mechanical and piezoelectric properties of electrospun PVDF nanofibers. Ceram Int 2021;47:11010-21.
68. Begum S, Ullah H, Ahmed I, et al. Investigation of morphology, crystallinity, thermal stability, piezoelectricity and conductivity of PVDF nanocomposites reinforced with epoxy functionalized MWCNTs. Compos Sci Technol 2021;211:108841.
69. Park H, Zhao J, Lu JP. Effects of sidewall functionalization on conducting properties of single wall carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 2006;6:916-9.
70. Punetha VD, Rana S, Yoo HJ, et al. Functionalization of carbon nanomaterials for advanced polymer nanocomposites: a comparison study between CNT and graphene. Prog Polym Sci 2017;67:1-47.
71. Shi K, Chai B, Zou H, et al. Interface induced performance enhancement in flexible BaTiO3/PVDF-TrFE based piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2021;80:105515.
72. Wang L, Cheng T, Lian W, et al. Flexible layered cotton cellulose-based nanofibrous membranes for piezoelectric energy harvesting and self-powered sensing. Carbohydr Polym 2022;275:118740.
73. Mahadeva SK, Walus K, Stoeber B. Piezoelectric paper fabricated via nanostructured barium titanate functionalization of wood cellulose fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2014;6:7547-53.
74. Zhang G, Liao Q, Ma M, et al. Uniformly assembled vanadium doped ZnO microflowers/ bacterial cellulose hybrid paper for flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators and self-powered sensors. Nano Energy 2018;52:501-9.
75. Lee M, Chen CY, Wang S, et al. A hybrid piezoelectric structure for wearable nanogenerators. Adv Mater 2012;24:1759-64.
76. Hu P, Yan L, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Niu J. Double-layer structured PVDF nanocomposite film designed for flexible nanogenerator exhibiting enhanced piezoelectric output and mechanical property. Compos Sci Technol 2018;168:327-35.
77. Bairagi S, Ali SW. Poly (vinylidine fluoride) (PVDF)/Potassium Sodium Niobate (KNN) nanorods based flexible nanocomposite film: influence of KNN concentration in the performance of nanogenerator. Org Electron 2020;78:105547.
78. Kang HB, Han CS, Pyun JC, Ryu WH, Kang C, Cho YS. (Na,K)NbO3 nanoparticle-embedded piezoelectric nanofiber composites for flexible nanogenerators. Compos Sci Technol 2015;111:1-8.
79. Chen H, Han S, Liu C, et al. Investigation of PVDF-TrFE composite with nanofillers for sensitivity improvement. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2016;245:135-9.
80. Nguyen VS, Rouxel D, Vincent B, et al. Influence of cluster size and surface functionalization of ZnO nanoparticles on the morphology, thermomechanical and piezoelectric properties of P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposite films. Appl Surf Sci 2013;279:204-11.
81. Huang L, Lu C, Wang F, Dong X. Piezoelectric property of PVDF/graphene composite films using 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-Perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane as a modifying agent. J Alloy Compd 2016;688:885-92.
82. Guan X, Xu B, Gong J. Hierarchically architected polydopamine modified BaTiO3@P(VDF-TrFE) nanocomposite fiber mats for flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators and self-powered sensors. Nano Energy 2020;70:104516.
83. Yao D, Cui H, Hensleigh R, et al. Achieving the upper bound of piezoelectric response in tunable, wearable 3D printed nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1903866.
84. Hong Y, Wang B, Lin W, et al. Highly anisotropic and flexible piezoceramic kirigami for preventing joint disorders. Sci Adv 2021:7.
85. Bowen CR, Kim HA, Weaver PM, Dunn S. Piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials and structures for energy harvesting applications. Energy Environ Sci 2014;7:25-44.
86. Yang Z, Zhou S, Zu J, Inman D. High-performance piezoelectric energy harvesters and their applications. Joule 2018;2:642-97.
87. Yang Z, Zu J. Toward harvesting vibration energy from multiple directions by a nonlinear compressive-mode piezoelectric transducer. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2016;21:1787-91.
88. Hong Y, Jin L, Wang B, et al. A wood-templated unidirectional piezoceramic composite for transmuscular ultrasonic wireless power transfer. Energy Environ Sci 2021;14:6574-85.
89. Lee EJ, Kim TY, Kim S, Jeong S, Choi Y, Lee SY. High-performance piezoelectric nanogenerators based on chemically-reinforced composites. Energy Environ Sci 2018;11:1425-30.
90. Ramadan KS, Sameoto D, Evoy S. A review of piezoelectric polymers as functional materials for electromechanical transducers. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23:033001.
91. Liu C, Djuth F, Li X, Chen R, Zhou Q, Shung KK. Micromachined high frequency PMN-PT/epoxy 1-3 composite ultrasonic annular array. Ultrasonics 2012;52:497-502.
92. Kim KB, Hsu DK, Ahn B, Kim YG, Barnard DJ. Fabrication and comparison of PMN-PT single crystal, PZT and PZT-based 1-3 composite ultrasonic transducers for NDE applications. Ultrasonics 2010;50:790-7.
93. Zhou Q, Lau S, Wu D, Shung KK. Piezoelectric films for high frequency ultrasonic transducers in biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci 2011;56:139-74.
94. Genchi GG, Ceseracciu L, Marino A, et al. P(VDF-TrFE)/BaTiO3 nanoparticle composite films mediate piezoelectric stimulation and promote differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Adv Healthc Mater 2016;5:1808-20.
95. Jiang L, Yang Y, Chen R, et al. Ultrasound-induced wireless energy harvesting for potential retinal electrical stimulation application. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1902522.
Cite This Article
Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS
OAE Style
Zhang W, Zhang Y, Yan X, Hong Y, Yang Z. Challenges and progress of chemical modification in piezoelectric composites and their applications. Soft Sci 2023;3:19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2022.33
AMA Style
Zhang W, Zhang Y, Yan X, Hong Y, Yang Z. Challenges and progress of chemical modification in piezoelectric composites and their applications. Soft Science. 2023; 3(2): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2022.33
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zhang, Weiwei, Yanhu Zhang, Xiaodong Yan, Ying Hong, Zhengbao Yang. 2023. "Challenges and progress of chemical modification in piezoelectric composites and their applications" Soft Science. 3, no.2: 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2022.33
ACS Style
Zhang, W.; Zhang Y.; Yan X.; Hong Y.; Yang Z. Challenges and progress of chemical modification in piezoelectric composites and their applications. Soft. Sci. 2023, 3, 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2022.33
About This Article
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data
Cite This Article 26 clicks
Like This Article 1
likes
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.